
Defensive Exit
Interviews and Records Retention for Departing Employees
By Jason Park, CCE;
ISFCE
Most companies have taken
care to insure that new and departing employees have completed Human Resource
files with Non Disclosure Agreements, Non Competition Agreements (where
applicable), Invention and Assignment Agreements and various other agreements,
acknowledgements and forms. Are companies doing enough to protect themselves
from Intellectual Property theft by departing employees and consultants?
Typically, departing
employees turn in their keys, access cards, and computers on their last day.
The keys are re-used, access cards destroyed, and the departing employee’s
computer makes its way back to the I.T. department to be reformatted and
reissued to a new employee. When companies re-issue computers without making a
forensically sound copy of the hard drive prior to reformatting, they hinder
their ability to proactively prosecute theft of Intellectual Property by
departing employees.
Properly securing the
original or making forensically sound copies of the computers and storage
devices of employees with access to Trade Secrets and Intellectual Property may
be the best proactive protection against theft. In the case of a pending
termination of an employee considered to have significant risk, making forensic
copies of their computers should be “standard operating procedure.” This action
may be the best defense against theft and misappropriation of assets. Laptop computers,
internet e-mail accounts, USB drives, compact flash cards, CD and DVD burners
and other technology advances have made copying and removing large amounts of
information from a company all but invisible to the eye.
What needs protecting? In the case of sales and support staff; customer lists,
prospect lists, competitive analysis, product development schedules, features
and price lists are typically easily accessible. With engineers; future
patents, methodologies, product development schedules, CAD and design files,
and algorithms are typically accessible and used frequently. Executives and
senior staff have access to all of these assets in addition to business plans,
financing, compensation plans, legal defense strategies, financials, and many
other proprietary or damaging forms of information and data.
How can you protect the company and
what do you look for? First and
foremost, the forensic securing of information through the use of proper
procedures and utilizing licensed or certified personnel or vendors is key to
avoiding spoliation or unintentional compromise of the electronic files. In
some states the collection of electronic evidence must be performed by a
licensed individual. Depending on the state, Licensed Private Investigators,
Attorneys and in some cases trained Certified Public Accountants may be
licensed, albeit not trained, nor qualified, to collect evidence. By using a properly licensed vendor, who can
be called as an independent expert witness, you can avoid claims of evidence
being collected by unlicensed individuals which in some states carries criminal
penalties for both the party securing the evidence AND the person who hired the
non-licensed person to secure the evidence. In addition to the correct
licensing, the party engaged to make the forensically sound copies of the hard
drives should be certified. Certification is completely voluntary in this field;
however, hiring a certified individual will ensure that a minimum standard of
knowledge has been attained by the expert.
So, should companies use their own
internal I.T. people to make
forensically sound copies of the hard drives of departing employees? Some
companies choose to do just this, and don’t run into problems providing that
they have adequately trained (and preferably certified) personnel performing
the hard drive acquisitions using “forensically sound procedures.”
Procedurally, the collection
of electronic evidence should follow similar processes to any other criminal/corporate
investigation:
Now that the evidence has
been “collected”, what next? Using only the “working” copy:
Once you review the evidence
for suspicious “activity”, and have restored any deleted files, you can proceed
sequentially with your discovery process and decide the extent full discovery
is required. Procedurally;
While all of this may not be
necessary, it is almost impossible to perform if addressed “after the fact” or
without forensic acquisition of the data being performed in short order. When
dealing with electronic data, time is of the essence. It is important to note
that any time a computer is turned on, a file is accessed, or information is
transferred, potentially valuable evidence can be overwritten, sometimes making
a prosecution extremely difficult. Similarly, “deleted” files are not
necessarily deleted, but in most cases the file is still on the computer but
the “pointer” to the file has been removed creating the appearance that the
file has been deleted. The space that has been released by the “deletion” will
be re-used by the computer over some period of time – sometimes very quickly.
There are ways to more permanently delete files which more technically
knowledgeable individuals may utilize, but it should be noted that in this
event – the act of intentionally and permanently deleting files and activity
records, if not performed as a normal activity, would provide inference of
intent (see the recent case against Sanjay Kumar, the
former CEO of Computer Associates International Inc., who pleaded guilty to obstruction
of justice and perjury).
What is a company to do these days?
1. Having a defined policy
for forensic storage declared in your employee manual, just as statements on
computer usage and access are addressed, provides notice to employees of your
intended commitment to safeguard company assets, intellectual property and
trade secrets.
2. Beyond agreements and
contracts, companies should consider forensically storing copies of departed
employees’ electronic files, at least those of key executives and “at-risk”
employees, as a safeguard and proactive offensive or defensive insurance
against future litigation – before the electronic records are destroyed.
Whether employees’ departures are voluntary or involuntary, some may be
classified as “at-risk” employees due to the nature of their jobs, understanding
of the law, the employees’ intension for starting a competing business, intent
to join a competitor, or even their attitude when departing the company.
If you have cause for
concern, or if your review of the recent activity of the individual is suspect,
a reminder letter of obligation restating the agreements the employee endorsed
may be all that is needed to protect the company. If a stronger notice is
required, a cease and desist can be sent with specific mention of activities
and files providing notice of the company’s intention and dedication to
protecting its assets.
3. Should there be a need to
litigate, finding evidence of the stolen Intellectual Property is sometimes as
simple as analyzing the ex-employee’s home computer and new work computer for
evidence of the files owned by the previous employer. Each file on the hard drives has a unique
“digital fingerprint” called a MD5 hash. This fingerprint is calculated using a
mathematical algorithm and can be calculated on recovered deleted files as well
as active files. Finding files with matching MD5 hashes or “fingerprints”
allows the employer to prove that their Intellectual Property exists or existed
on the ex-employee’s home computer, or on the competitor’s computer system,
allowing for additional defendants to be named in the suit.
Remember, electronic data is volatile. Making a forensically sound copy of the data as soon
as possible enhances your chances of prevailing down the road.
Jason Park
Litigation Solution, Inc.
214-939-9700 Office
Mr. Park is a Certified
Computer Examiner (CCE) and is a Licensed Private Investigator in the State of
He is a member of the
International Society of Forensic Computer Examiners, and has been involved in
the digital litigation support field since 1994.
First printed in Volume 14,
Number 3 of Employment Law Strategist (R), an ALM publication. Reprinted with
permission.